Rocket Pool
Liquid Staking — Decentralized ETH staking. rETH.
AI review
AI assessment
updated 4h ago·Claude (preview)·previewRocket Pool is a liquid staking protocol. 4 of 16 risk feeds in the registry report on it. No incidents are recorded in the registry. No material change has been detected in the current window.
- Governance: Two-DAO: pDAO (RPL holders, fully on-chain since Houston) + oDAO (permissioned oracle set, applies upgrades) governance
- 4 of 16 feeds report on Rocket Pool. coverage
- No incidents recorded — an empty incident history is itself a signal. incident
AI-generated summary of facts already in this registry — not a Rails assessment, not a risk score, and not a ranking. Per the project charter, the registry never produces its own composite risk judgement. Verify every point against the linked sources below. This is an illustrative preview of a proposed feature; the content is not live.
Feeds
How feeds see it
Seen through 3 of 4 methodology lenses (rating, monitoring, research). A neutral view of who is looking and how — not a risk judgement.
The 4 reporting feeds are split on how fully they assess Rocket Pool: 2 assess it fully, 2 only partially, and they use different methodologies and scales. We show every position side by side and do not reconcile them into a single verdict — oracle diversity made visible, not adjudicated.
Qualitative rETH assessment; suitable as minority collateral exposure.
5-dimension AI-consensus, Phase-0 preliminary; spot-check pending.
Position-management tooling: live loan-health / safety-ratio tracking and automated liquidation protection for leveraged positions.
View sourceProcess Quality Review published (PQR id 581, ~2024); verbatim score pending confirmation.
View sourceDecentralization maturity: who controls keys, upgrades, and admin powers. Stage 0–2 framework.
Quantitative on-chain risk dashboards for lending markets: liquidations, collateral health, exposure.
Vault-level risk monitoring for Morpho curators: allocation risk and curator behavior.
Institutional-grade credit-risk ratings for DeFi protocols and borrowers. Credora by RedStone; GraphQL API + on-chain attestations (EAS).
Independent risk rating for DeFi vaults; 300+ subscores across 85+ mechanisms. Open-source.
Deterministic vault risk scoring across 700+ vaults: asset quality, code maturity, governance. Open methodology (public API, CLI, MCP server).
Vault analytics and risk-adjusted yield across 50+ protocols; exploits, concentration, risk-adjusted APY. Paid structured API.
Real-time risk scores for DeFi liquidity pools: risk metrics, TVL, APY, security grades.
DAO governance-capture risk: delegate/voting-power concentration, cost-to-attack vs. treasury value, and proposal/power-shift monitoring across major DAOs. Open-source.
Risk ratings (A–F) decomposed into protocol, asset, chain, and pool risk across DeFi yield pools. Open whitepaper methodology. (Standalone product migrated into YO Protocol in 2026 — ratings shown are pre-migration samples.)
Agent-based economic simulation: insolvency prevention, parameter optimization, and risk-scenario analysis for lending markets.
Edge risk oracles and economic-risk dashboards: real-time parameter automation and scenario stress for lending markets (active on Aave, GMX, Pendle).
Governance
Governance at a glance
- Governance
- Two-DAO (pDAO + oDAO)
- Core contracts
- Upgradeable
Structural facts, distilled from the sourced control records below — neutral capabilities, not a risk score.
| Governance | |
| Upgradeability | |
| Operators | Permissionless node operators (RPL bond)on-chain |
| Admin control |
Audits
| Auditor | Date | Scope | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sigma Prime | 2021-09 | Core staking protocol (v1 launch) | Report |
| Consensys Diligence | 2021-04 | Core smart contracts | Report |
| Consensys Diligence | 2023-01 | Atlas (v1.2) upgrade | Report |
| Trail of Bits | 2021 | Smart contract security review | Report |
Representative public audits, attributed and linked to source — not a Rails assessment, and not a completeness or safety guarantee.