Compound V2
Lending — Legacy Comptroller + cToken pool model. Superseded by Comet (V3); minimal active development.
AI review
AI assessment
updated 4h ago·Claude (preview)·previewCompound V2 is a lending protocol. 3 of 16 risk feeds in the registry report on it. 1 sourced incident on record. No material change has been detected in the current window.
- Governance: Compound Governor Bravo (on-chain, COMP voting) governance
- 3 of 16 feeds report on Compound V2. coverage
- Most recent recorded event: COMP distribution bug (Comptroller, Proposal 62). incident
AI-generated summary of facts already in this registry — not a Rails assessment, not a risk score, and not a ranking. Per the project charter, the registry never produces its own composite risk judgement. Verify every point against the linked sources below. This is an illustrative preview of a proposed feature; the content is not live.
Feeds
How feeds see it
Seen through 2 of 4 methodology lenses (rating, monitoring). A neutral view of who is looking and how — not a risk judgement.
The 3 reporting feeds are split on how fully they assess Compound V2: 1 assess it fully, 2 only partially, and they use different methodologies and scales. We show every position side by side and do not reconcile them into a single verdict — oracle diversity made visible, not adjudicated.
Legacy Compound V2 (Comptroller / cToken) position management; support being deprecated.
View sourceLegacy Compound (V2) pools rated pre-migration (e.g. an ETH lending pool rated A).
View sourceProcess Quality Review of Compound (Finance) published (PQR id 426); verbatim score pending confirmation.
View sourceDecentralization maturity: who controls keys, upgrades, and admin powers. Stage 0–2 framework.
Protocol risk research and parameter recommendations; collateral and governance risk.
Quantitative on-chain risk dashboards for lending markets: liquidations, collateral health, exposure.
Vault-level risk monitoring for Morpho curators: allocation risk and curator behavior.
Multi-dimension registry: Control, Exit, Autonomy, Open Access, Verifiability via LLM consensus.
Institutional-grade credit-risk ratings for DeFi protocols and borrowers. Credora by RedStone; GraphQL API + on-chain attestations (EAS).
Independent risk rating for DeFi vaults; 300+ subscores across 85+ mechanisms. Open-source.
Deterministic vault risk scoring across 700+ vaults: asset quality, code maturity, governance. Open methodology (public API, CLI, MCP server).
Vault analytics and risk-adjusted yield across 50+ protocols; exploits, concentration, risk-adjusted APY. Paid structured API.
Real-time risk scores for DeFi liquidity pools: risk metrics, TVL, APY, security grades.
DAO governance-capture risk: delegate/voting-power concentration, cost-to-attack vs. treasury value, and proposal/power-shift monitoring across major DAOs. Open-source.
Agent-based economic simulation: insolvency prevention, parameter optimization, and risk-scenario analysis for lending markets.
Edge risk oracles and economic-risk dashboards: real-time parameter automation and scenario stress for lending markets (active on Aave, GMX, Pendle).
Governance
Governance at a glance
- Governance
- DAO (on-chain)
- Core contracts
- Upgradeable
Structural facts, distilled from the sourced control records below — neutral capabilities, not a risk score.
Incidents
A faulty governance upgrade introduced a comparison error in the V2 Comptroller's reward logic, erroneously distributing large amounts of COMP (estimates ~$80M–$160M). User collateral and borrows were never at risk; some COMP was voluntarily returned, the rest lost. Patched via governance.
Material risk events, presented verbatim from cited sources — not a Rails assessment.